Data Supply Chains - Where it started

Mihir Wagle 5 min read
AIsupply chain

I've been thinking about blogging about my career experiences. I started in supply chain and now work in data and analytics and I've really been thinking about concepts that flow from the physical world to the world of data and AI.

When I started working with i2 Technologies in 2000, I learned a lesson about diapers that changed how I view technology forever.

The lesson was called the "Bullwhip Effect." This is how it works: A Baby's R Us store (yes I'm dating myself) sees a slight, 5% blip in consumer demand for diapers. The store manager panics and orders 10% more from the distributor "just to be safe." The distributor sees a 10% spike and orders 20% more from the regional center. By the time the signal reaches the P&G factory, the machines are screaming at 150% capacity to meet a phantom surge.

A tiny ripple at the edge caused a massive, wasteful tsunami at the core.

Manufacturing spent the 90s and the 2000s solving this by dismantling the silos between the Store and the Factory. We moved from "Push" manufacturing (building inventory blindly) to "Pull" logistics (Just-in-Time delivery based on real demand).

Twenty years later, as I look at the Modern Data Stack, I realize with horror that we have forgotten everything.

Today's Data Engineering industry is effectively running a 1980s factory. We are obsessed with "Warehousing." We celebrate how many Petabytes we can store. We build massive "Lakes" and fill them with raw telemetry "just in case." We treat Data Inventory as an asset, when any supply chain expert knows that inventory is a liability. It costs money to store, it hides inefficiencies, and most importantly - it rots.

I believe the era of the Data Warehouse is ending. We don't need bigger storage lockers. We need Data Logistics. We need to apply the physics of the Supply Chain—Just-in-Time delivery, Spoilage management, and End-to-End Lineage - to the flow of information.

If we want to unlock the promise of Enterprise AI, we have to stop acting like archivists and start acting like logisticians. Here is how we do it.

1. The Shift: From "Push" to "Pull" (Just-in-Time Data)

In the 90s, manufacturing moved from "Push" (Make a lot and store it) to "Pull" (Toyota's Just-in-Time system: Don't build the car until the order comes in).

Today, most Data Engineering is still stuck in the "Push" era. We write ETL jobs to move data from Salesforce to a Lake, then from the Lake to a Warehouse, then from the Warehouse to a Mart. We push petabytes of data through this pipe every night, regardless of whether anyone actually reads it. This is the digital equivalent of filling a warehouse with spare parts that might never be used.

The Logistics Approach: We need to embrace Zero-Copy Mirroring. Instead of physically moving the data in advance, we logically "map" the data where it lives (On-Premises, SaaS, or rival Clouds). We only move the bytes when the "Customer" (The AI Model or Analyst) places an order.

By decoupling Compute from Storage location, we stop paying the "Migration Tax." We treat data storage as a distributed network, not a central fortress.

2. The New Metric: Managing "Data Spoilage"

Grocery stores know that inventory has a shelf life. Lettuce rots in 3 days. If the truck is 4 days late, the value of the cargo isn't just lower—it's zero. Data has a half-life, too. But we rarely measure it.

  • Fraud Signals: Rot in milliseconds.
  • Inventory Levels: Rot in minutes.
  • Financial Reports: Rot in quarters.

Right now, our "Data Supply Chain" treats all data as non-perishable canned goods. We put high-frequency trading signals on the same "Batch Processing" cargo ship as the monthly HR report.

The Logistics Approach: We need to segment our pipelines by Perishability, not just volume. If the data is perishable (AI signals), it demands the "Air Freight" cost structure (Streaming/PubSub). If it is durable, it goes via "Sea Freight" (Batch).

The job of the modern Data Architect is to match the Cost of Transport to the Expiry Date of the insight.

3. The Last Mile: Bridging the Air Gap

The hardest part of any supply chain isn't the highway; it's the Last Mile. In Tech, the "Last Mile" is the messy, secure, complex gap between the Enterprise's on-premise reality and the Cloud's pristine AI engines. Amazon wins the last mile in logistics because it treats the long tail as not a problem but an opportunity. They want to solve the messy problems that no one else felt there was value in.

Microsoft, Databricks, Google and others are building Ferrari engines (AI). But Ferraris don't run on dirt roads. The companies that win the next decade won't be the ones with the best LLMs; they will be the ones that build the Connectivity Fabric—the bridges, gateways, and secure tunnels—that allow those LLMs to safely access the "dirty" data locked behind corporate firewalls without demanding a 3-year migration project first.

Conclusion: The Era of the Data Logistician

We are done with the era of the Database Administrator (The Archivist). We are entering the era of the Data Logistician. Your job is no longer to guard the warehouse. Your job is to optimize the Flow of Value.

  • Reduce Inventory (Storage).
  • Increase Velocity (Throughput).
  • Eliminate Spoilage (Latency).

If we apply the physics of the supply chain to the bits in our cloud, we finally stop building Swamps and start building Intelligence.

← Back to blog

Enjoyed this post? Get new ones in your inbox.